NJ – Advocating guitly of aggravated assault, now face the burden CFA Municpal same incident. Non bis in idem?
I drove my car and hit a drunk telephone pole single-vehicle accidents. My gf was in the car and suffered injuries. I was accused of aggravated assault and entered a guilty plea PTI. Now I'm used PTI, I receieved a summons for driving city driving. However, my point of view of PTI are: 1) license agreement between defendant. 2) Must maintain paid work. 3) 50 hours of community service. 4) defensive driving courses. 5) alcohol rehabilitation program to attend. Is the load FSC prohibited because they conflict with the 1 and 2 conditions? If I lose my license, I lose my job because it requires a valid license. In addition, the FSC is the municipal office, in violation of res judicata, because the aggravated assault charge in the poisoning of Essex County-based? Please only useful opinions. No obvious "a lawyer" Response;.
There is double jeapordy is a separate charge – should have a good lawyer before filing any thing – and that not doing so, they should have one to see if can work out an agreement or discounts, CFA, deferred or rejected.
